Politics as a continuation of the war

Come and otmeš enemy country, came the enemy and seize the land to you. This ancient Sumerian proverb carved on clay board before some 5500 years, perhaps the oldest, or at least one of the oldest records in which the civilized man said the definition of war.

After Adolf Hitler came to power 1933rd behaved according to the first part of the ancient Sumerian messages. Territory and power hungry, aggressive policy is used to destroy the system of European collective security, established the Versailles peace, and finally, on this day seventy years ago, 1 September 1939th years, invaded Poland.

He started World War II, opened the door the greatest human slaughter in history so far.

After seven decades, the measure of responsibility for the slaughter house is situated in the political ring, since the revisionist historiography of the Second World War back three or four decades to prepare for this favorable terrain.

I often irresponsible or, politics is mentioned rasprostrla map of the past and without any hesitation, with disregard for facts, causal-consequential relations and moral order, was equal to the responsibility for starting the Second World War, Third Reich and the Soviet Union, Nazism and Bolshevism, Hitler and Stalin .

In this spirit, in mid-August and formulated a rezolucijaParlamentarneskupštineOEBS-a, where is the support for this position found in the Covenant that Molotov and Ribbentrop signed in Moscow 23rd August 1939, just a week before the start of World War II.

The said Covenant, which we recently wrote on the page, Politika, are Hitler and Stalin divided Europe into spheres of interest and accelerate the course of history, but it is quite certain that everything would be different, perhaps a pact would not have been signed, that ondašnjoj the political and diplomatic scene in Europe and the world, democratic state in Hitler and Nazism have recognized the crucial danger.

It should be recalled that the leading Democratic players of that time were the highest-ranking imperial powers and the imperial standpoints through which they look at the world logically and led to the disaster of the Second World War.

British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, the most representative of the imperial elite, first set foot on the soil of continental Europe when he met with Hitler in the spa Godezberg 1938th year. Discussed the peace for him, but some states to which Hitler turned his machine was only an artificial construction.

For Chamberlain the bogey of communism nadvijen of Europe was more dangerous than Hitler, and for both Social Democrats were almost the same as communists.

In this logical sequence, the British prime minister was more important that Germany is not Marxist, but it will be a Nazi.

At that time the right-wingers in France kliktali 'Better Hitler than Blum ", while the famous Klajvdonskom circle, gathered around the British Foreign Minister Lord Halifax, valid slogan' Better Hitler than Stalin."

The debate onemoćalog League of Nations, the then Soviet Foreign Minister Litvinov constantly repeated: "Peace is indivisible," but Chamberlain thought it was possible that the British Empire could remain in peace, and that will lead to another war. The League of Nations was laid much, he did not believe in its effectiveness, then no European collective security. So is dismissed Foreign Minister Anton future, whose beliefs were different.

After signing the Munich Agreement 30th September 1938, which confirmed that Hitler at the height of prestige and power, because it is the correct received Sudeten area, Chamberlain was in front of his residence at 10 Downing Street claimed that the nation brings "best honorable peace from Germany and it was peace of our time "Although it was not" any honorable peace, or peace in general, but the prelude to a war of our time ", as defined by the then correspondent of" Politika "from London Predrag Milojevic.

Mentioned parliamentary resolution OSCE completely ignores these and many other facts of importance to the debate about responsibility for starting World War II.

It is not disputed that Nazism and Stalinism were totalitarian systems, but it should not be disputed nor the reasons why the anti-Hitler coalition forces entered the alliance with the USSR against Hitler, and not with Hitler against the USSR.

That the responsibility for World War II on the side of both Berlin and Moscow, the anti-Hitler coalition would not have been possible, but would be formed, as is, some kind of anti-Hitler-coalition staljinska.

Why, after all, 1939. years there has been no creation Antistaljinske coalition in which, with former Democratic state, Hitler was one of its supporting pillars?

If you follow the logic istoriografskih, political and ideological revision of the Second World War, it seems to many today, and the elite representatives of the United Europe and the democratic world, complaining that something did not happen.

So not surprised that such a sharp reaction on arriving in Moscow, including President Dmitry Medvedev, who on Sunday said that everyone is "cynical lies" claims that if the equal responsibility in the Second World War with the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.

Fortunately, this controversy can lead to peace, but not bode well that they sort of inversion confirms the famous Clausewitz thinks that war is the continuation of politics by other means.

As the present policy of continuing the war, of course, by other means.